The Bellevue Gazette

Unions suffer sharp decline in membership

WASHINGTON (AP) — Union mem­ber­ship plum­meted last year to the low­est level since the 1930s as cash-strapped state and local gov­ern­ments shed work­ers and unions had dif­fi­culty orga­niz­ing new mem­bers in the pri­vate sec­tor despite signs of an improv­ing economy.

Gov­ern­ment fig­ures released Wednes­day showed union mem­ber­ship declined from 11.8 per­cent to 11.3 per­cent of the work­force, another blow to a labor move­ment already stretched thin by bat­tles in Wis­con­sin, Indi­ana, Michi­gan and other states to curb bar­gain­ing rights and weaken union clout.

Over­all mem­ber­ship fell by about 400,000 work­ers to 14.4 mil­lion, accord­ing to the Bureau of Labor Sta­tis­tics. More than half the loss, about 234,000, came from gov­ern­ment work­ers, includ­ing teach­ers, fire­fight­ers and pub­lic administrators.

But unions also saw losses in the pri­vate sec­tor even as the econ­omy cre­ated 1.8 mil­lion new jobs in 2012. That mem­ber­ship rate fell from 6.9 per­cent to 6.6 per­cent, a trou­bling sign for the future of orga­nized labor, as job growth gen­er­ally has taken place at nonunion companies.

To employ­ers, it’s going to look like the labor move­ment is ready for a knock­out punch,” said Gary Chai­son, pro­fes­sor of indus­trial rela­tions at Clark Uni­ver­sity in Worces­ter, Mass. “You can’t be a move­ment and get smaller.”

Union mem­ber­ship was 13.2 per­cent in 1935 when Pres­i­dent Franklin D. Roo­sevelt signed the National Labor Rela­tions Act. Labor’s ranks peaked in the 1950s, when about 1 of every 3 work­ers was in a union. By 1983, roughly 20 per­cent of U.S. work­ers were union members.

Losses in the pub­lic sec­tor are hit­ting unions par­tic­u­larly hard because that has been one of the few areas where mem­ber­ship had grown over the past two decades. About 51 per­cent of union mem­bers work in gov­ern­ment, where the rate of union mem­ber­ship is 37 per­cent, more than five times higher than in the pri­vate sector.

Until recently, there had been lit­tle resis­tance to unions orga­niz­ing gov­ern­ment work­ers. But that began to change when Repub­li­can Gov. Scott Walker of Wis­con­sin signed a law in 2011 elim­i­nat­ing most union rights for gov­ern­ment work­ers. The state lost about 46,000 union mem­bers last year, the vast major­ity in the pub­lic sector.

The reces­sion that began in 2008 also led to much deeper cuts in state and local gov­ern­ment than any pre­vi­ous reces­sion, accord­ing to a report this month from the Nel­son Rock­e­feller Insti­tute of Gov­ern­ment at the State Uni­ver­sity of New York at Albany. Since August 2008, state gov­ern­ment employ­ment has declined by 135,000, while local gov­ern­ment employ­ment fell by 546,000.

Teach­ers unions were among the hard­est hit, with the ranks of union­ized pub­lic school teach­ers and edu­ca­tors falling by 123,000 last year. Den­nis Van Roekel, pres­i­dent of the National Edu­ca­tion Asso­ci­a­tion, the nation’s largest teach­ers union, accused politi­cians who cut pub­lic edu­ca­tion fund­ing of “inflict­ing tremen­dous harm to our nation’s 50 mil­lion stu­dents and risk­ing our children’s future.”

Despite the steady mem­ber­ship decline, unions remain a potent polit­i­cal force because of the money they spend help­ing union-friendly can­di­dates seek­ing pub­lic office. Unions spent more than $400 mil­lion dur­ing the 2012 elec­tion cycle to sup­port Pres­i­dent Barack Obama’s re-election, keep a Demo­c­ra­tic major­ity in the Sen­ate and aid other state and local candidates.

But as more gov­er­nors and state law­mak­ers tar­get unions, labor lead­ers have been forced to spend more money fight­ing polit­i­cal skir­mishes and less on orga­niz­ing new members.

Orga­niz­ing is very expen­sive, and it gets fought now in the pub­lic sec­tor as well as in the pri­vate sec­tor,” said Barry Hirsch, a labor econ­o­mist at Geor­gia State University.

Dwin­dling mem­ber­ship means unions carry far less influ­ence than they used to in set­ting a bench­mark for wages and ben­e­fits that might be fol­lowed at nonunion com­pa­nies. Unions are already gear­ing up to defeat Repub­li­can gov­er­nors in Ohio, Michi­gan, Florida, Penn­syl­va­nia, and Wis­con­sin, where they fear more anti-union mea­sures could crop up soon.

Union offi­cials blame mem­ber­ship losses on the lin­ger­ing effects of the reces­sion, as well as GOP gov­er­nors and state law­mak­ers who have sought to weaken union rights.

Our still-struggling econ­omy, weak laws and polit­i­cal as well as ide­o­log­i­cal assaults have taken a toll on union mem­ber­ship and in the process have also imper­iled eco­nomic secu­rity and good, middle-class jobs,” said AFL-CIO Pres­i­dent Richard Trumka.

In Indi­ana, where a new right-to-work law took effect last March, the state lost about 56,000 union mem­bers. The law pro­hibits unions from requir­ing work­ers to pay union fees, even if they ben­e­fit from a col­lec­tive bar­gain­ing agree­ment. Michi­gan law­mak­ers approved a sim­i­lar mea­sure in December.

Another prob­lem for unions is an aging mem­ber­ship that is not being replaced by younger mem­bers. By age, the union mem­ber­ship rate was high­est among work­ers age 55 to 64 (14.9 per­cent) and low­est among those 16 to 24 (4.2 percent).

In New York, the state with the high­est union den­sity, nearly one-quarter of the work­force belonged to a union. North Car­olina had the low­est at 2.9 percent.

Among full-time wage and salary work­ers, union mem­bers in 2012 had median weekly earn­ings of $943, while those who were not union mem­bers earned $742.

Becky Brooks Posted by on Jan 24 2013. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS Feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments are closed

Search Archive

Search by Date
Search by Category
Search with Google

The Bellevue Gazette | 250 Castalia St. Suite E, Bellevue, OH 44811 | 419-483-4190 | Hours of operation: M - F 8am - 5pm

We use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our Web site. For more information click here.
Click on the following for legal information: Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
Copyright © 2010 - 2013, Ohio Community Media