The Bellevue Gazette

Senate nears vote on Sandy aid

By ANDREW MIGA

Asso­ci­ated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — Three months after Super­storm Sandy dev­as­tated coastal areas in much of the North­east, the Sen­ate moved Mon­day toward pass­ing a $50.5 bil­lion emer­gency pack­age of relief and recov­ery aid after House Repub­li­cans stripped it of spend­ing unre­lated to disasters.

Despite oppo­si­tion from con­ser­v­a­tives con­cerned about adding bil­lions of dol­lars more to the nation’s debt, North­east law­mak­ers were opti­mistic about hav­ing the 60 votes needed to win Sen­ate approval and send the long-delayed pack­age to Pres­i­dent Barack Obama, who has said he would sign it. The House passed the bill two weeks ago.

Law­mak­ers say the money is urgently needed to start rebuild­ing homes, busi­nesses, pub­lic trans­porta­tion facil­i­ties and other infra­struc­ture dam­aged by the Oct. 29 storm, one of the worst ever to strike the North­east. Sandy is blamed for more than 130 deaths in the U.S. and tens of bil­lions of dol­lars in prop­erty dam­ages, par­tic­u­larly in New York and New Jersey.

There’s no excuse for delay,” said Sen. Bob Menen­dez, D-N.J. “We need to get assis­tance to vic­tims of Sandy as soon as possible.

The biggest chunk of money is $16 bil­lion for Hous­ing and Urban Devel­op­ment Depart­ment com­mu­nity devel­op­ment block grants. Of that, about $12 bil­lion will be shared among Sandy vic­tims as well as those from other fed­er­ally declared dis­as­ters in 20112013. The remain­ing $3.9 bil­lion is solely for Sandy-related projects.

More than $11 bil­lion will go to the Fed­eral Emer­gency Man­age­ment Agency’s dis­as­ter relief aid fund for shel­ter, restor­ing power and other storm-interrupted util­ity ser­vices and meet­ing other imme­di­ate needs aris­ing from Sandy and other dis­as­ters. Another $10 bil­lion is devoted to repair­ing New York and New Jer­sey tran­sit sys­tems and mak­ing them more resis­tant to future storms.

The fund­ing in this bill is urgently needed,” said Sen. Bar­bara Mikul­ski, D-Md., as Sen­ate debate began. “Hun­dreds of thou­sands of fam­i­lies have seen their lives turned upside down.”

Sen. Dan Coats, R-Ind., said Repub­li­cans weren’t seek­ing “to under­mine” help for Sandy vic­tims, but instead wre try­ing to make sure that the money was actu­ally being spent on emer­gency needs.

We’re sim­ply try­ing to say we need some stan­dards,” Coats said.

Ear­lier in Jan­u­ary, Con­gress approved and Obama signed a $9.7 bil­lion bill to replen­ish the National Flood Insur­ance Pro­gram, which has received well more than 100,000 flood insur­ance claims from busi­nesses, home­own­ers and busi­nesses related to Sandy. Added to the new, $50.5 bil­lion pack­age, the total is is roughly in line with the $60.4 bil­lion that Obama requested in December.

Sandy dam­aged or destroyed 305,000 hous­ing units in New York and more than 265,000 busi­nesses were dis­rupted there, accord­ing to offi­cials. In New Jer­sey, more than 346,000 house­holds were destroyed or damaged.

The aid pack­age was greased for pas­sage before the last Con­gress adjourned and the new one came in on Jan. 3. But Speaker John Boehner refused to bring it to the floor after two-thirds of House Repub­li­cans voted against a “fis­cal cliff” deficit reduc­tion deal rais­ing taxes on cou­ples mak­ing more than $450,000 a year while defer­ring some $24 bil­lion in spend­ing cuts to have been shared between defense and domes­tic programs.

The ruckus after the Sen­ate had passed an ear­lier $60.4 bil­lion Sandy relief pack­age by a nearly 2-to-1 mar­gin on Dec. 28 exposed deep polit­i­cal divi­sions within Repub­li­can ranks. “There’s only one group to blame for the con­tin­ued suf­fer­ing of these inno­cent vic­tims, the House major­ity and their speaker, John Boehner,” Repub­li­can New Jer­sey Gov. Chris Christie fumed at the time.

Top House Repub­li­cans responded by bring­ing new Sandy aid leg­is­la­tion to the floor under ground rules designed to win over as many Repub­li­cans as pos­si­ble while retain­ing sup­port from Democ­rats eager to approve as much in dis­as­ter aid as possible.

GOP lead­ers cut spend­ing in the Sen­ate bill unre­lated to dis­as­ters. One was to trans­fer $1 bil­lion for train­ing Iraqi police­men to instead be used on bol­ster­ing secu­rity at U.S. diplo­matic mis­sions abroad in the wake of a Sept. 11 ter­ror­ist attack on the Amer­i­can con­sulate in Beng­hazi, Libya, where the U.S. ambas­sador and three other Amer­i­cans were killed.

Also deleted was $188 mil­lion for an Amtrak expan­sion project that included new, long-planned tun­nels from New Jer­sey to Penn Sta­tion in Man­hat­tan, and another $150 mil­lion for fish­eries dis­as­ters that states such as Alaska and Mis­sis­sippi could have shared.

After all the cost-cutting, 179 House Repub­li­cans still voted against the dis­as­ter aid pack­age with only 49 favor­ing it. GOP lead­ers had to rely on yes votes from 192 Democ­rats to pass it.

As with past nat­ural dis­as­ters, the Sandy aid bill does not off­set the aid with spend­ing cuts, mean­ing the aid comes at the cost of higher deficits. The lone excep­tion is an off­set pro­vi­sion requir­ing that $3.4 bil­lion for Army Corps of Engi­neers projects to pro­tect against future storms be cov­ered by unspec­i­fied spend­ing cuts of an equal amount in other pro­grams before next October.

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, sought to amend the final pack­age Mon­day with a pro­vi­sion to cut fed­eral pro­grams across the board by one-half of 1 per­cent through 2021 as a way to pre­vent the dis­as­ter aid from swelling the U.S. debt. Democ­rats were opti­mistic Lee would be unable to muster 60 votes needed to prevail.

As of Mon­day, FEMA said it spent $3.3 bil­lion in dis­as­ter relief money for shel­ter, restor­ing power and other imme­di­ate needs aris­ing from the storm.

New York, New Jer­sey, Con­necti­cut, West Vir­ginia, Vir­ginia, Mary­land, New Hamp­shire, Ohio, Delaware, Rhode Island, Penn­syl­va­nia, Mass­a­chu­setts and the Dis­trict of Colum­bia have shared that money.

Becky Brooks Posted by on Jan 28 2013. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS Feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments are closed

Search Archive

Search by Date
Search by Category
Search with Google

The Bellevue Gazette | 250 Castalia St. Suite E, Bellevue, OH 44811 | 419-483-4190 | Hours of operation: M - F 8am - 5pm

We use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our Web site. For more information click here.
Click on the following for legal information: Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
Copyright © 2010 - 2013, Ohio Community Media